La Gazette Picarde le 20/11/2009.
Quand on finit par brûler ce que l'on avait commencé par adorer.
Je ne tombe pas dans le mystique mais je ne peux m'empêcher de penser à cette parabole de l'humanisme chrétien.
Comment interpréter ce déchaînement populaire et médiatique. Comment se fait-il qu'un homme supporte ainsi les critiques les plus acerbes ? Intentionnel, geste réflexe, erreur d'arbitrage voici autant de motif de montrer son mécontentement. Mais ce mécontentement est-il directement adressé à Thierry Henry ou est-il destiné à d'autres ?
Nous vivons une déviance de notre société qui désigne un bouc émissaire à son propre mécontentement. Notre société étant sans bon-sens et sans esprit critique n'a de cesse a s'attacher à des faits divers qu'à des problèmes de fonds. Les médias sensibles à tout ce qui peut faire vendre leur papier s'emboîtent immédiatement dans cette brèche.
Sommes-nous face à une société en déliquescence, je le pense malheureusement,
alors n'ayant pas la prétention d'être un psychanalyste je laisse le débat entre vos mains et j'attends vos réponses afin d'ouvrir un débat sur ce sujet qui en soi n'en est pas un concernant le geste de Thierry Henry mais qui en est un sur la situation de nos sociétés.
Enfin c'est juste mon avis.
Thierry Henry.
Gazette Picardy on 20/11/2009.
When you finally burn what they had begun to worship.
I do not fall into mysticism, but I can not help thinking of this parable of Christian humanism.
How to interpret this outburst and popular media. How is it that a man and bear the harshest critics? Intentional act reflexively error arbitration here as a reason to show his displeasure. But this discontent is it sent directly to Thierry Henry or is it for others?
We live in a deviance of our society which identifies a scapegoat for his own discontent. Our society is without common sense and uncritically never ceases to attach to the facts that various problems of funds. The media sensitive to anything that can sell their paper fits into the breach immediately.
Are we in a society in decay, I think, unfortunately,
then did not claim to be a psychoanalyst I leave the debate between your hands and I welcome your responses to open a debate on this subject that in itself is not one concerning the gestures of Thierry Henry but which is the situation of our societies.
Finally it's just my opinion.
Gazette Picardy on 20/11/2009.
When you finally burn what they had begun to worship.
I do not fall into mysticism, but I can not help thinking of this parable of Christian humanism.
How to interpret this outburst and popular media. How is it that a man and bear the harshest critics? Intentional act reflexively error arbitration here as a reason to show his displeasure. But this discontent is it sent directly to Thierry Henry or is it for others?
We live in a deviance of our society which identifies a scapegoat for his own discontent. Our society is without common sense and uncritically never ceases to attach to the facts that various problems of funds. The media sensitive to anything that can sell their paper fits into the breach immediately.
Are we in a society in decay, I think, unfortunately,
then did not claim to be a psychoanalyst I leave the debate between your hands and I welcome your responses to open a debate on this subject that in itself is not one concerning the gestures of Thierry Henry but which is the situation of our societies.
Finally it's just my opinion.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire