ECOLOGIE : VOUS AVEZ DIT ECOLOGIE ?
La Gazette Picarde le 10 janvier 2010.
Depuis des semaines voire des années on nous bassine avec la planète qu'il faudrait, nous disent-ils sauver.
Vous connaissez mes convictions si vous suivez un petit peu mes chroniques et vous connaissez mes convictions profondes.
Mais sincèrement, pensez-vous que le débat soit réellement à ce niveau.
Depuis plusieurs milliards d'années la planète est passée par toutes sortes d'étapes climatiques, glaciations, désertification, éruptions volcaniques massives ayant entrainées la disparitions de nombreuses espèces, créant ainsi une bio diversité magistrale.
Au cours de ces époques cataclysmiques les vies animales et végétales se sont considérablement adaptées ou se sont éteintes.
Quant à la terre elle est toujours là différentes mais invariablement là pour encore quelques milliards d'années.
Alors la vraie question que je me pose est la suivante :
doit-on sauver la planète ou doit-on sauver l'espèce animal appelée « HOMO SAPIENS » ?
Car vouloir sauver la planète n'induit pas forcément de sauver l'espèce humaine qui en soit est incapable de comprendre qu'elle fait partie du règne animal. Espèce animal qui dilapide sans compter les ressources indispensables à sa survie. Espèce animal qui scie la branche sur laquelle elle est assise. Espèce qui n'a pas compris que sauver la planète c'était sauver l'homme avant tout.
Mais voilà l'homme est cupide, égoïste, ne voit que son profit immédiat sans projeter son avenir. Il a écarté de l'équation le facteur essentiel qu'il est c'est à dire lui même en tant qu'animal profitant des ressources de la terre courant par de la même à sa propre perte.
Alors si l'homme n'est pas remis au centre du débat il disparaîtra en concourant à son propre suicide et à sa disparition programmée par lui-même.
Pas drôle n'est-ce-pas ! Mais tellement exact. Alors Copenhague, Cohn Bendit, le Grenelles de l'environnement et consorts ne sont que des manœuvres lancées en pâture à la sagesse populaire pour calmer ses appréhension et ses doutes justifiés.
Quant au reste rien ne changera et nous sombrerons doucement jusqu'à disparaître de la surface de la terre.
Enfin c'est juste mon avis.
__________
ECOLOGY: YOU SAID ECOLOGY?
Picardy Gazette January 10, 2010.
For weeks or even years we bowl with the planet he would tell us they save.
You know my beliefs if you do a little bit my reviews and you know my beliefs.
But honestly, do you think the debate is really at this level.
For several billion years the planet has gone through all sorts of steps climate, glaciation, desertification, massive volcanic eruptions that brought about by the disappearance of many species, creating a masterful bio diversity.
During these periods cataclysmic lives of animals and plants have significantly adapted or become extinct.
And the earth is still there different but invariably there for a few billion years.
So the real question I ask myself is:
Should we save the planet or should we save the species called Homo sapiens?
For wanting to save the planet does not lead necessarily to save the human race who is unable to understand it is part of the animal kingdom. Animal species besides squandering resources indispensable for survival. Species that saw the branch on which it sits. Species that did not understand that saving the planet was saved man first.
But that man is greedy, selfish, only sees the immediate benefit without projecting its future. He rejected the equation of the essential factor that is to say it himself as an animal taking advantage of the resources of the earth informed by the same to his own loss.
So if man is not delivered to the center of the debate it will disappear in contributing to his own suicide and his disappearance programmed by himself.
Not funny is not it! But so true. So Copenhagen, Cohn Bendit, the Grenelle of the environment and others are merely maneuvers undertaken to feed the wisdom to soothe her apprehension and doubts justified.
For the rest nothing will change and we will sink slowly to disappear from the face of the earth.
Finally it's just my opinion.
Picardy Gazette January 10, 2010.
For weeks or even years we bowl with the planet he would tell us they save.
You know my beliefs if you do a little bit my reviews and you know my beliefs.
But honestly, do you think the debate is really at this level.
For several billion years the planet has gone through all sorts of steps climate, glaciation, desertification, massive volcanic eruptions that brought about by the disappearance of many species, creating a masterful bio diversity.
During these periods cataclysmic lives of animals and plants have significantly adapted or become extinct.
And the earth is still there different but invariably there for a few billion years.
So the real question I ask myself is:
Should we save the planet or should we save the species called Homo sapiens?
For wanting to save the planet does not lead necessarily to save the human race who is unable to understand it is part of the animal kingdom. Animal species besides squandering resources indispensable for survival. Species that saw the branch on which it sits. Species that did not understand that saving the planet was saved man first.
But that man is greedy, selfish, only sees the immediate benefit without projecting its future. He rejected the equation of the essential factor that is to say it himself as an animal taking advantage of the resources of the earth informed by the same to his own loss.
So if man is not delivered to the center of the debate it will disappear in contributing to his own suicide and his disappearance programmed by himself.
Not funny is not it! But so true. So Copenhagen, Cohn Bendit, the Grenelle of the environment and others are merely maneuvers undertaken to feed the wisdom to soothe her apprehension and doubts justified.
For the rest nothing will change and we will sink slowly to disappear from the face of the earth.
Finally it's just my opinion.
Proposer une meilleure traduction
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire